Follow Us:
20

Bell releases the Motorola ATRIX HD LTE for $600 outright

By on August 14, 2012 at 10:34am in Bell Mobility News, Mobile News


As expected, Bell has officially released the Motorola ATRIX HD LTE today.

The ATRIX HD comes packed with specs: 1.5Ghz dual-core processor, 4.5 inches (720p HD screen), LTE, Android OS 4.0 (no word on Jelly Bean), 1GB RAM, 8GB internal storage (expandable via microSD card), a 8MP camera, 1780mAh battery, and has the familiar Kevlar backing that we saw in the new RAZR.

As for prices, $599.95 outright or $49.95 on a 3-year. We’ve had some hands-on time with the ATRIX HD, make sure you check it out here.

Source: Bell

Related posts:

  1. Bell slightly delays the Motorola ATRIX HD LTE and Motorola RAZR V launch
  2. Bell to release the Motorola ATRIX HD LTE and Motorola RAZR V “early August”
  3. Bell releases the Motorola RAZR V
  4. Image: Here are the prices for the Bell Motorola ATRIX accessories

Discussion

20 comments for “Bell releases the Motorola ATRIX HD LTE for $600 outright”

  1. I’d rather have the $300 Galaxy Nexus

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 3

    Posted by {JPM} | August 14, 2012, 10:40 am
    Reply to this comment

  2. Can someone confirm whether this is also available at Virgin Mobile?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 4

    Posted by Doug | August 14, 2012, 10:41 am
    Reply to this comment

  3. Ugh not another one… These people should be updating the existing phones they’ve got first.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 0

    Posted by nrj4life | August 14, 2012, 10:42 am
    Reply to this comment

  4. Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 37

    Posted by V | August 14, 2012, 10:45 am
    Reply to this comment

    • As far as I know, the iphone4 is iOS based phone and Atrix is Android based phone, that’s 2 kind of dierffent operating systems. It totally depends on what kind of OS you want to use. the iphone 4 would be a little expensive than Atrix, and the screen is little smaller. But in my opinion, the iphone 4 would be better than Atrix.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

      Posted by Samet | August 27, 2012, 11:56 pm

  5. Why do phones gotta cost so much?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 2

    Posted by Dern | August 14, 2012, 11:05 am
    Reply to this comment

  6. @Dern Especially Motorola garbage..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 13

    Posted by Lil Wayne | August 14, 2012, 11:16 am
    Reply to this comment

  7. This isn’t going to sell well, not with the s3 so close in price and nearly the same size. Especially with moto’s upgrade history

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2

    Posted by GCooper | August 14, 2012, 11:19 am
    Reply to this comment

  8. Not trying to beat a dead house, but why $599, when the exact same phone is $449 on AT&T. Can we say price gouging.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Jimbo | August 14, 2012, 11:51 am
    Reply to this comment

  9. Why do are we seeing the soft buttons if the screen is off?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

    Posted by wewewi | August 14, 2012, 12:54 pm
    Reply to this comment

  10. Moto! You don’t have a great enough rep to be in the +$600 crowd of Samsung or Apple. Stick to the 400′s.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2

    Posted by Rich | August 14, 2012, 1:10 pm
    Reply to this comment

  11. nothing much new here so why the big $$? fail.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    Posted by shaker | August 14, 2012, 1:41 pm
    Reply to this comment

  12. Dat bezel

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1

    Posted by Studystand | August 14, 2012, 1:56 pm
    Reply to this comment

  13. Its too bad about the battery. I was planning on getting this phone because I love my original Atrix but not with battery performance this low…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    Posted by someguy | August 14, 2012, 2:37 pm
    Reply to this comment

  14. I must agree, a 300 Galaxy Nexus does sound a little more appealing ..

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Taylor Weatherill | August 14, 2012, 2:39 pm
    Reply to this comment

  15. I will wait and see if the rumours are true and see if the Razr HD comes to Canada as that is a competitor for Apple and Samsung.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    Posted by shadyguy | August 14, 2012, 2:42 pm
    Reply to this comment

  16. That is one thick bezel. Not attractive at all.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    Posted by cdn5abi | August 14, 2012, 3:00 pm
    Reply to this comment

  17. the one thing I appreciate about motorola is the reception (signal strengh) and call quality. my brothers razr is far better than my galaxy s2 in that reguard… and the s3 hasn’t improved in that area.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Andrew | August 14, 2012, 5:20 pm
    Reply to this comment

  18. Keep in mind 95% of bell stores and the website will refuse to sell you at outright pricing.

    You’re forced to take a 30$-day contract (50$) plus pay (35$) activation fees.

    The absolute cheapest “outright price” is avaliable if you already have a bell account, in which case they’ll “only” charge you a bogus 20$ activation fee.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    Posted by David | August 14, 2012, 6:09 pm
    Reply to this comment

Post a comment