The Convergence Consulting Group created a report back in September called “Canadian Wireless 2007-2014: Assessing the Impact of New Entrants”. The report went into detail of how Videotron, EastLink, Shaw, DAVE Wireless, Globalive and Public Mobile would impact the Canadian wireless landscape over the next 5 years.
In light of last weeks event where the CRTC stated that “Globalive does not meet Canadian ownership rules” which possibly has delayed them from launching their highly anticipated WIND Mobile brand, Convergence has revised their report that omits Globalive entirely. Read on and let us know your thoughts on a world without WIND.
The report states that assuming Globalive does not enter the market “we forecast new entrants’ will have 7.2 million or 22.5% of Canadian wireless subscribers by year-end 2014. We forecast Canadian subscriber additions will average 1.8 million/annum 2010-2014 as opposed to 1.45 million 2006-2009, mainly due to lower prices (based on what the consumer receives for the price), and wireless penetration at 91% year-end 2014, up from 68% year-end 2009. Note: In our September Report we forecasted 7.8 million, 24%, 1.9 million/annum and 92.5% penetration”.
Brahm Eiley, President of The Convergence Consulting Group, said “We are forecasting that by year end 2014 the Incumbents will have 77.5% of the market (in terms of subscribers), Shaw and Videotron will each have approximately 6% respectively, DAVE and Public Mobile will each have approximately 5% respectively, and EastLink 1%. Please note that we are assuming above that Videotron does not enter the Toronto market. It should be noted that Shaw and Videotron’s national market share understates just how significant they will be in Alberta/BC and Quebec in terms of market share, whereas DAVE and Public’s market share overstates as they will be covering much more territory than Shaw and Videotron.”
Other key takeaways from the report are:
- Without Globalive, we forecast Dave and Public will collectively see 900,000 more subscribers, and better financials.
- Not including spectrum capex, new entrant cablecos will have positive free cash flow by the end of their second year of operations, DAVE and Public Mobile will be positive by the end of their third year.
-Despite the impact of new entrants, we forecast by 2014 Rogers will still be Canada’s largest player, followed by Bell and Telus.
-Over the 2010-2014 timeframe, we forecast Bell, Rogers & Telus will gain more consumer wireless subscribers in their traditional residential wireline telephone and cable footprint regions than out-of-region. We believe the wireless market will increasingly regionalize and that in-region bundles, will become even more important.
Read the report here at Convergence
Related News & Reviews:

Translation… Wind by itself doesn’t matter… The world will keep turning and there will still be increased competition.
Now let’s all move on.
Reply
Randy Reply:
November 2nd, 2009 at 9:26 pm
Real Translation… The more things change, the more they stay the same.
The incumbents, JUST 3 COMPANIES, in 5 years will still own 80% of the market and this doesn’t matter?? I think this is a clear indication that Wind does indeed matter and that the entire purpose of the spectrum auction by the Government of Canada (if Wind is blocked from launching) is an EPIC FAIL!
I’d like to see what the report has to say about pricing with and without Wind.
Reply
Hugo Beaulieu Reply:
November 2nd, 2009 at 9:45 pm
Well If I read this right they assumed Wind’s share was spread among Dave and Public (900k each), so in the end the incombents don’t loose much more business than with Wind. That’s why I said it seems like it won’t matter.
And let’s face it, if you get say 5 players regionally instead of 3, that’s a big plus.
And Shaw/Videotron are likely to have a bigger impact on the Big3 than Wind would have… so again, won’t matter much.
And I still think that if they were dumb enough to go ahead when it was apparently quite obvious they didn’t meet the ownership rules, they wouldn’t have deserved my money (if they’re stupid with theirs, in can only be worst with mine)
Reply
When they launch, my belief is that Shaw and Videotron will present more of a serious challenge to the big 3 than Wind ever will – here’s why:
1. Established brand equity and strong familiarity among their regional audiences
2. Existing customer base to sell in to; think, quad play bundling with TV, internet, and home phone. (Look out Bell!)
3. Huge amounts of free cash flow from cable operations will allow them to take loss leaders and compete much more agressively on price than WIND, which is burdened with $700-800MM in debt right out of the gate with $0 revenues.
btw – WIND cash positive in three years, GOOD LUCK! Microcell couldn’t do it in five years when there was 1/10 the competition there is today…
Reply