WIND Mobile HTC Radar review (Video)

Daniel Bader

March 19, 2012 9:25pm

Being WIND Mobile’s first Windows Phone, the HTC Radar is probably the best choice they could have made. Released last year on T-Mobile in the United States, the Radar may not be a spec powerhouse, but for $399 it is good value in an attractive, well-constructed package. While some users may be reticent to switch over to Windows Phone, existing WIND users may find solace in the new platform where lower-end Androids fail to deliver.

Is the HTC Radar a good choice for you? Read on.


– Windows Phone 7.5 Mango
– 3.8-inch 480×800 pixel S-LCD display
– 1Ghz Qualcomm MSM8255 Snapdragon processor (single-core), Adreno 205 GPU
– 512MB RAM, 8GB internal storage (non-removable)
– 5MP back camera w/ LED flash,  VGA front-facing camera
– WiFi (b/g/n), Bluetooth 2.1 w/A2DP, A-GPS
– 1520mAh battery
– 120.5 x 61.5 x 10.99mm
– 137g

Design & Display
The Radar is compact, fairly light, and solidly built. With a Gorilla Glass front panel and a single piece of aluminum outfitting the sides and back, the device feels like extremely sturdy in the hands. It’s light, at 137g, but not feebly so, and the overall size allows it to slip into a pocket or purse with ease.

Its screen is not great, especially when compared with the Lumia 800. While HTC has done some amazing things before with its Super LCD technology (just look at the Incredible S, Amaze 4G and Raider) this is not one of their best efforts. While colours are accurate and contrast is decent, there is a huge space between the glass and the LCD panel itself, leading to excessive reflections, poor viewing angles and low visibility in direct sunlight.

The chassis, on the other hand, is very well made, with the only exception being the plastic latch on the bottom which covers the SIM card slot. The entire phone is made up of a brushed silver aluminum, with two areas of white plastic at the top and bottom which house the antennas. Such a colour scheme may not work for some due to lack of contrast, but I like it very much. The phone is compact without being small, and for a mid-range product feels decidedly premium in the hand.

Its buttons, too, have great feedback. Precise, with excellent travel, the Radar feels very satisfying to use. The two-step camera shutter, especially, is one of the best I’ve used on any phone.

For a size comparison, the Radar is slightly taller and thicker than the iPhone 4S, but around the same width.


As one would expect from a single-core processor, the sheer speed of the Radar has been surpassed by three generations of iOS and Android devices. But apparently no one told that to Microsoft, who appear to be able to create a functional, smooth and attractive smartphone experience from these “ancient” SoCs. To be fair, we’re not engaging in any seriously taxing 3D gaming or 1080p video decoding, but Windows Phone Mango can hold its own.

Unlike the Lumia 800, which I faulted quite heavily for not being up to the task of its iOS or high-end Android peers, I cannot and should not do the same for the Radar. A device which, even last year, was considered mid-range, it falls into WIND’s line-up not as a thoroughbred, but a trusty pony: staid, ready to work, and tireless. The Radar can, like the Lumia, only record video at 720p; it stutters occasionally when scrolling through long lists; and, worst, its IE9 browser is ponderously slow, though extremely smooth once everything is loaded.

This is the Windows Phone parallax: a bizarre amalgam of 1:1 touch precision, achingly slow app load times and unique, though uniform, design qualities. All this is to say, I cannot fault the Radar for its performance without implicating the entire OS and every phone on which Windows Phone runs. Unlike Android, there is little performance differentiation among these devices, though I did notice a slight drop in overall speed coming from the 1.4Ghz MSM8255 in the Lumia 800 to the 1Ghz variety in the Radar.


The Radar runs the latest version of Windows Phone Mango, 8107, and comes with a couple interesting pieces of (removable) software.

First, HTC Watch is a lovely way to consume media. Early on the selection was poor, but now you have movies hitting Watch at the same time as on iTunes. Films such as Hugo, Young Adult and Transformers: Dark of the Moon are available, as well as some fare from independent distributors. They can be purchased for between $14.99 and $19.99, and rented from as low as 49c, and if you make the purchase on the Radar, it carries through to any other compatible device, including a number of HTC tablets like the Flyer and Jetstream.

Quality is good, though limited to 720p for obvious reasons. Space concerns seem real here, though, as the Radar only contains 8GB of internal storage, and cannot be augmented with a microSD card. That should only leave space for around four feature-length films. TV shows can also be purchased, though only by individual episode, and at $2.49 each it would be far cheaper to purchase the entire season from iTunes or Best Buy.

The HTC Hub is the company’s way of producing an app that tries to mimic the time/weather/news/stocks widget combo from Android, with little success. The app has a Live Tile that shows local weather based on your GPS location. Functionally, it works as most Windows Phone apps do: you slide horizontally through the screens, in this case weather, news, stocks and Featured Apps. It’s slick and looks good.

Photo Enhancer, Locations, Connected Media and Notes are pretty self-explanatory, though it should be mentioned that Locations does not, as I originally thought, provide turn-by-turn navigation. Instead it is a sort of “trip journal” where you can leave “footprints” of your travels through photos and map locations. You can indeed get written directions through Bing Maps, as you would on any other non-Nokia Windows Phone, but the app in its current form is of limited use to most people.

Connected Media is a DLNA-capable media sharing center, allowing you to stream on-board music, video and photos to a compatible television or computer. Photo Enhancer applies preset filters to existing photos, but can’t even share them from within the app. It just saves the new photo to the Camera Roll.

One nice inclusion, which has admittedly nothing to do with HTC directly, is Tango, a VoIP/video calling app that is preloaded on the device. Because Mango brought support for front-facing cameras, Windows Phone devices have been slow to adopt the rather esoteric video calling features outside FaceTime, but with the release of Skype for Windows Phone beta, the Radar’s FFC should stand it in good stead for the future.

Most of these apps, except for Watch, seem like de facto filler, less real apps than just stubs so that the home screen wouldn’t look bare. Few of them will be used, especially since they can all be uninstalled and replaced with better third-party equivalents.

HTC did a good thing in allowing for Mobile Hotspot support out of the box, making it one of the first Canadian Windows Phones with such abilities.

As a whole, I really like Windows Phone, and the more I use it the more I can see its potential. Though limited in number and typically of lower quality than their iOS or Android equivalents, the Radar had no issues running the apps I threw at it, and proves that you don’t need a powerhouse smartphone to be productive.


The Radar was one of the first products of HTC’s renewed focus on photography. As such it is outfitted with a 5MP camera, a Backside Illuminated sensor and f2.2 lens for better low-light shots. Mostly, though, the Radar is quick, taking with an “off-to-shutter” speed of just over one second. When already turned on, the shutter takes photos in around 0.4 seconds, and with the optional burst mode, the phone can take five photos in one second.

Colours are accurate, though a little bit subdued, with a good amount of detail. You can manually adjust focus by tapping on the screen, while ISO, white balance and tone can be changed from within the menu. The flash, as with all phone cameras, is anemic and largely worthless except for shooting right up close, but thankfully when used it does not usually wash out the subject.

The device comes with a panorama mode as well, and can create some remarkable images from the steady-cam stitching technique.

Video, though limited to 720p, is detailed and quite smooth, with excellent image stabilization. Overall, the Radar provides one of the most enjoyable out-of-box camera experience on Windows Phone. Though the quality does not quite rival the Carl Zeiss lens on the Lumia 800, it handily beats the Lumia 710 and most other first-generation Windows Phone devices.

The Rest

Battery life on the Radar is quite good, with a 1520mAh battery taking the brunt of the usage. Subjectively, I was easily able to get through an entire day of near-constant usage, as the cell is plenty big enough for the sipping propensities of the SLCD display, single-core processor and efficient OS.

I was able to power through an impressive 7 hours 49 minutes of video looping, making it one of the longest-lasting Windows Phone devices I’ve used.

In terms of network speed and quality, there is one thing to consider: WIND employees a Home and Away status on its network, which differentiates between domestic and roaming areas. Once out of a Home area, the Radar considers that roaming in general; there is no way to distinguish domestic and international roaming at this point. What that means is if you want your Radar to fall back to Rogers EDGE (as all Wind products do) when outside a Home area, it will, by default, also roam anywhere else in the world with an agreement. A patch is coming later this year to add the option of distinguishing between local roaming such as WIND Away and international roaming such as T-Mobile in the States, but until make sure to turn off roaming in the Settings if you want to prevent unnecessary charges.

The phone supports 14.4Mbps downlink and 5.76Mbps uplink, so it is considered a “4G” device, which is prominently displays on the top-left of the screen at all times. However, average speeds are closer to 1.5-3Mbps down 0.1 – 0.8Mbps up.

As for call quality, WIND has always been the superior to Mobilicity – in my opinion – in terms of call quality, and the Radar does nothing to sway that feeling. Calls came through clearly, with no apparent sibilance or “far-away effect.” There is a mono loudspeaker on the back of the device that does an OK job at projecting voices, music and video, but I’d recommend sticking with headphones or a Bluetooth headset if you’re going to be going hands-free.


I like Windows Phone and the HTC Radar. I think they’re both a solid 7/10, and that’s where I’ll leave this. For $399, the Radar is, in my opinion, a bit overpriced, especially since you can procure the almost-as-good-and-in-some-ways-better Nokia Lumia 710 for $250 on Rogers. But if you’re already a WIND customer and are having issues with your Android phone, or just want the next best thing to an iPhone without spending the money, the Radar is a great bet.

The HTC Radar is available for $399 outright, and $99 on the WINDtab.

  • jellmoo

    A nice little phone, but the price difference between this and the 710 is a little too steep. The 710 is probably the best bang for your buck smartphone around, and this guy feels like a poor replacement to that.

  • briggs

    you mean windows 7 phone. They had the HTC maple at launch time. WHich was windows…6.5 I think? Either way, first good windows phone.

    • Daniel Bader


      Microsoft’s previous Windows-based smartphone OS was called Windows Mobile, not Windows Phone.

    • briggs

      @Daniel. Good point. I tend to group the two together, but I do stand corrected.

  • Anthony

    Some parts of the review seems harsh… especially on “phone” features:

    – slow network speed (not really the phone’s fault, I’d blame this on Wind/reception)
    – excellent sound quality from headpiece
    – WIFI, BT, GPS all connect quickly and accurately



    The HSPA+ speeds are close to what I get on Rogers on my Samsung Focus, but mine is a 7.2Mbps modem..

    • Daniel Bader


      The carrier and the handset go hand in hand. The experience of a Galaxy Nexus, for example, is very different on Bell than it is on WIND by virtue of the former’s HSPA+ network speeds and the latter’s relatively slow 3G speeds. As a result, I felt a 2-point deduction was fair for such a fundamental downside as slow network speeds.

      Thanks for the comment, though, I see where you’re coming from.

    • Alex Perrier

      Daniel and Ryan, the network quality also depends on where you are using it. For example, i would assume the London network has much less stress than the Greater Toronto Area network because there are much less users in London.

  • gwydionjhr

    Another fair and balanced review. Kudos!

  • Vish

    Been using one for the last 4 months (T-Mobile’s HTC Radar) on Wind. Absolutely fantastic experience. Prior to that I had a Dell Venue Pro which was also good but the Radar is amazingly fast, nifty and looks and acts very premium-like.

    The camera quality is fantastic due to its f2.2 sensor.

    Looking forward to a Lumia 900 on Wind….will that happen? 😉

    • Alex Holmes

      If it does I am going to squeel. That phone is amazing and will bring plenty of customers over.

  • Mr. Bill

    Not too shabby.
    Though it will take more of an effort to get me to try WP.

    Was long time WM user, and I’d have a hard time going back to less then I had with WM itself.

    It’s just not all that yet.

    • Ahmed Eltawil

      Windows Phone and Windows Mobile are completely different. Windows Phone is a complete rewrite and isn’t related in any way to Windows Mobile. I would give it a try, it’s been running great on my Samsung Focus for over 1 year now and still not a single hickup.

  • ryan

    it’s a true shame that you didn’t mention the social networking and instant messaging integration found in windows phone mango….. It truly sets the platform apart from ios and android. I am a surround 7 user myself, and look forward to the fall lineup of windows phones.

    • Daniel Bader

      @Ryan, I have talked extensively about the benefits of Windows Phone Mango, including social networking and messaging integration, in my previous device reviews, as well as my Windows Mango review. Check them out on the site!

  • Deli

    Nice! Why can’t they make something like this having an Android equivalent? It has a good size and color for the mainstream folks.

  • crunch204

    @Daniel Bader

    HTC watch, if im not mistaken, is a cloud-based storage service. The movies and shows dont get saved to your phone, but to HTC’s cloud allowing you to access them on multiple devices. This means your device, no matter the built in stoarge size, does not suffer.

    • Daniel Bader

      True, but you can download a movie for offline access. While you can certainly delete the film and re-download it, the small amount of storage space is still an issue here.

  • Ed

    I have this phone on Wind.
    So far I am loving it. Very smooth, easy to use. Does 95% of what iOS or Android does and does it better.

  • ile2010

    The Lumia 710 is a superior phone to this (except for design), because of its price advantage, Nokia Drive offline navigation, and its pentaband UMTS radio (some of us do travel outside of Canada). It was a truly idiotic move for a budget carrier to get the $400 Radar instead of the Lumia.

    There’s nothing wrong with the Radar, as it gives you the same fluid WP7 experience, but the Lumia is a way better buy.

  • Chuck

    Nice Review. It would be nice if you indicated that even though it has 8GB of storage it is suplimented with the free 25GB of skydrive for Documents, Photos and Media

  • Alex Holmes

    Hey there, I am a Wind employee and I would like to make a quick correction here. The united states roaming and CDN roaming charges are exactly the same, therefore it does not matter whether you are in the states or in Canada. So the fact that the phone does not distinguish between Wind away and T-Mobile roaming is not a concern.

    Also, writing that it has slow speeds especially for a “4g” phone is a bit silly, considering Wind has made no claims to having a 4g network. We run on 3g, and hence we have 3g speeds.

    Other than that, good solid review of the phone.

    • T1MB0T

      so no 4g? only 3g and no LTE. Some future that is! thanks for clearing that up Alex. Any news on the international roaming? you know the one that does not work for most? Also any news on the call center that was a go and now that is a no go? Why did they scrap it? well speak up! Also is it true that tony still has the rogers BB? well it was posted that he still does, and the video.. classic!

      thanks alex true to form wind offers little in answers but much in excuses.

    • Alex Holmes

      Hey T1MB0T,

      I do understand where you are coming from with Wind’s service issues. And I definetly understand how Wind seems to have excuses for a lot of issues people have with them. However, We are a service designed to save people money while still giving them good phones. Wind is not for everyone. If you can afford to spend 80-120 dollars a month on a plan with one of the Big three, go right ahead. I personally have a Bell phone aswell as Wind. I use Bell for the better connection in areas like White rock and abbotsford and Wind for the unlimited Data.

      International roaming works on all GSM enabled phones, but only in areas slated on a list which is available at Our roaming rates are generally lower than competators.

      We do not have a 4g Network as of yet, but the Upgrade is planned. Being a two year old company with innexpensive plans does not leave us with an excess of funding like the big three. We constantly expand and correct our service and strive to eventually have a network rivaling the big three (Who have been around for 20+ years and charge almost double for their service)

      We have a call centre, so I dont really understand what you mean by that statement.

      “Also is it true that tony still has the rogers BB? well it was posted that he still does, and the video.. classic!”

      I confess I have no idea what this means.

      Well, I hope I have helped to answer some of your concerns T1MB0T.

    • Daniel Bader

      @Alex, it is relevant because the Radar displays 4G on the display.

    • Keegan Goerz

      Hey Alex,
      Id just like to say, I am a long time WIND customer, and do completely love the company and brand – very much am behind the success.
      However I have to correct you – WIND branded the device as “4G” and has said that their HSPA+ network is “4G”.
      Im in Edmonton/St. Albert and get great data speeds considering the relative infancy of the network, mind you I understand it won’t be the same as the big guys. Regardless, from a GENERAL consumers point of view, they will see 4G and think its the same as everyone else. I don’t think the comment was made to attack the carrier, however meant to clear things up.
      Again I am a huge reporter – but WIND certainly DOES advertise as 4G, at 14.4, across all of its network. We have covered that on Mobile Syrup before.
      ~ Keegan

      “Hey there, I am a Wind employee and I would like to make a quick correction here. The united states roaming and CDN roaming charges are exactly the same, therefore it does not matter whether you are in the states or in Canada. So the fact that the phone does not distinguish between Wind away and T-Mobile roaming is not a concern.

      Also, writing that it has slow speeds especially for a “4g” phone is a bit silly, considering Wind has made no claims to having a 4g network. We run on 3g, and hence we have 3g speeds.

      Other than that, good solid review of the phone.”

  • T1MB0T

    Too bad its on wind! Sad to say now that they are not going to bid this is pretty much what you are stuck with. With all the new phones coming with LTE and less and less on wins frequency it is a phone you will have for a long long time. Oh well.. I am sure who ever buys wind this time will have more success than the owners in egypt.

  • rick

    does the windows phone need 10 updates every 2 weeks like my windows pc?

  • Bukhovian Smorzhee

    I don’t like the HTC Radar because:

    1. The white cover over the SIM card port at the bottom sticks out and looks lame. It make it look like a keyboard is supposed to slide out from the bottom.

    2. When you turn on the wifi hotspot it says that it will automatically turn off after a few minutes if not used. There’s no way to keep it on indefinitely (unlike Android).

    3. The screen isn’t as vibrant as the Galaxy Nexus.

    4. The battery is too small. The standard for batteries is 3300mah like the razr maxx. The Radar’s battery is less than 2000mah. Kudos to WP for getting the most out of this small battery, but it is still too small.

    If I got a WIND phone I recommend the Galaxy Nexus.

    • Alex Holmes

      I agree with you here, for an extra 150 dollars you can’t go wrong with the Nexus.

    • ile2010

      3300 mAh is a standard now? That’s like saying that a 41mp PureView camera is a standard.

      One (or two) phones having a feature hardly makes that feature a “standard”.

  • arkeetek

    HTC just updated it’s Location app to include offline map download. It does the same as Nokia Drive now.

    • ile2010

      So it gives you free turn-by-turn navigation? I don’t care if it’s just a map.