Follow Us:
26

Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE Review


Half a decade ago we dreamed of portable computing. We dreamed of going to the mall or the coffee shop and getting stuff done without toting around a five-pound laptop and a power cord and, in the likely event there was no free WiFi, a data stick. I think we’re at the glorious prescipise of being in that future, and products like the Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE are such marvellous inventions because they eschew extra. Gone are superfluous cables and cords and power bricks.

While mainly a consumption device it works pretty well at content creation. Bring along a thin Bluetooth keyboard and you can do all your writing, too. But there are two things that differentiate this model from its bigger brother, the Galaxy Tab 10.1. First, it’s significantly smaller; second, its data connection is much, much faster. But at $425 on a 3-year data term, it’s also a sizeable investment. But is it worth it? Read on to find out.

Specs:
- Android 3.2 Honeycomb with TouchWIZ for Tablets
- 8.9″ 1280×800 pixel LCD
- 1.5 Ghz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon processor
- 1GB RAM, 16GB internal storage
- 3MP back camera / 2MP front camera
- WiFi (b/g/n), Bluetooth 3.0, A-GPS
- LTE 75Mbps, HSPA+ 42Mbps
- 230.9 x 157.8 x 8.6 mm
- 455g

The Device

You get a feeling of deja vu when you first pick up the Tab 8.9. It’s identically styled to its 10.1 peer — obviously smaller and lighter — with a slight bezel and solid plastic build. The back of the device is a matte black, smooth and sophisticated. Like the 10.1, there is a silver sliver near the top where the camera module and LTE antennas are installed, and the colour extends and wraps around the tablet, forming an attractive two-toned delineation. I prefer the look of the 8.9 to the toy-like white of the 10.1, and because it’s more compact it feels significantly more solid. Samsung has been very consistent with its tablet designs, from the original Galaxy Tab to the Honeycomb varieties of every size, and this tablet feels distinctly part of a line, a franchise of Samsung products that provide a consistent user experience.

Not only are the buttons in the same place from device to device — the power button is on top next to the volume rocker; the stereo speakers on the bottom when held in landscape; the headphone jack, proprietary charging port — but the Tab 8.9 makes improvements: its screen is of high quality, its external speaker loud and full, and its processor extremely capable. The screen on the Tab is one of the best I’ve seen. Though not Super AMOLED, its smaller size produces a far sharper image than its 10-inch counterparts. Viewing angles are superb, while colour is vivid and accurate. I would have liked to see higher brightness levels as the screen is practically unusable in direct sunlight, but indoors I can keep it on Auto without issue.

The location of the so-called stereo speakers continues to irritate me, as the Tab 10.1 had the same design flub: why, if the idea is to simulate sound coming from two directions, put them a) so close together and b) on the same side of the device? While the quality is excellent, it ultimately loses any true separation qualities, largely negating the existence of the second speaker. And if you’re holding the device in portrait mode, the speakers are pointed either to your right or left, again destroying any stereo fidelity that may have existed had they been on either side.

The Tab feels excellent in the hands: it is compact enough to be held in a single paw, and light enough to replace any eReader you may choose to toss aside. And because it is a sweet spot between the constrained 7-inch and often-unruly 10.1″ varieties, it truly commands over both. I’ve found that, unlike the 4:3 ratio’d iPad, most Android tablets are just not practical to hold in portrait mode: they are just too tall to be weighted correctly, and too heavy to hold in one hand. The Tab 10.1 comes as close to being a portrait-friendly Android tablet as I’ve found, but even still I like the 8.9 more for reading, browsing and general use tablet use.

Honeycomb

What we find here is very much the same experience as when Honeycomb debuted, though both Samsung and Google have made improvements here and there. First, Google updated Honeycomb to version 3.2 earlier this year, further boosting performance throughout the UI. No more are applications slow to load or screen transitions overly jittery. Though this is certainly still the comparatively unstable and at-times infuriating Android we know, most of the lingering performance bugs have been ironed out.

The most notable addition to Android 3.2 is a Compatibility Mode that, when enabled, stretches out legacy apps to fill the screen in the most intelligent way possible. Most applications that are not tablet-optimized function poor-to-average at best with this enabled, but it’s often better than only having a quarter of the screen in use. Think of this mode as the Android equivalent of the 2x button on the iPad for iPhone apps.

Samsung has made its own cuts and additions to Honeycomb, though it’s plain to see they didn’t spend at much time on overhauling the interface as on their Galaxy phones. For starters, the home screen is identically disarrayed as previous Android tablets: icons and widgets are haphazardly strewn across a cluttered home screen. The app drawer icon is impossibly far from everything else; the soft keys for back, home and multitasking are permanently on the bottom left. Samsung has wisely, though not thoroughly enough, revamped the settings bar on the bottom right, bringing instant widget-like access to hardware toggles like WiFi, Bluetooth and brightness.

Next to the soft buttons is a screenshot icon, while a dock bar containing an assortment of overlay programs are accessed via a small arrow in the middle of the screen. They include a memo pad, task manager, calculator and others, but they’re not really apps, more like high-functioning widgets. As long as the app you are in does not hide the permanent dock bar at the bottom of the screen — and most don’t — you can sketch a face, recall a number or jot down a recipe without exiting anything. It’s a handy inclusion, but I wish they were more functional and customizable.

Samsung has added a Power Saving menu which will turn off certain hardware functions when the battery dips below a certain customizable number. This is handy when a heavy LTE connection is chewing battery life, but ultimately less useful on a tablet than a phone. This comes pre-loaded with a number of game demos and apps. As usual, I’m only going to mention two things: that they cannot be uninstalled, and that only TV & Radio is even remotely useful. There are too many shortcuts to mobile-formatted web pages and too little value to these apps to give them any credence.

Samsung, on the other hand, bundles some interesting fare: three of its four TouchWIZ Hubs have made their way over from the Galaxy S II. Readers Hub is an amalgamation of News powered by PressDisplay, Magazines powered by Zinio, and Books powered by Kobo. Each app is the equivalent of that which you’d find in the Marketplace, but rely instead of Samsung’s proprietary Android store for updates, making them far less useful. However, they’re each still excellent at what they do, and it’s nice to see Samsung partnering with services that innovate rather than trying to doing it on their own.

The Music Hub is powered by 7Digital, a company that is rapidly expanding and easily the best iTunes alternative for Android users. Albums are fairly priced and the interface is tablet-friendly and smooth. Social Hub is the runt of the trio, simply aggregating your email and social networks onto a proverbial conveyer belt of information. While we’d recommend staying far away from this app on your Galaxy phone, because neither Facebook nor Twitter have a tablet-approved app of their own, the Social Hub becomes a bit more handsome, and we only mean a bit.

The third-party app situation, while improved from the beginning of the year, is still woeful when compared to iOS. Many great Android phone apps have no tablet equivalent, and looks dreadful when sized up or stretched out. There simply are not enough good choices for eBooks, Twitter, Facebook, RSS, games et al. While we can recommend one or two decent ones in each category, many developers who would otherwise be porting their iPad apps to Android see little financial incentive to do so.

Google itself has created some spectacular tablet apps, though: Gmail on Honeycomb is still the best email experience out there, and Samsung has bundled the popular Swype keyboard to make tablet input a bit easier. Google Reader has received a Honeycomb refresh, but staples like Google+ have yet to see dedicated tablet versions. We’d like to say that Ice Cream Sandwich is going to herald a new era of awesome Android tablet apps, but we’re not so sure. Until there is a viable economic push from Google to its myriad devoted developers, Android tablet users will have to settle for less. Of everything.

Performance

The 1.5Ghz dual-core Snapdragon processor from Qualcomm is the same variant we saw in almost every dual-core device in late 2011. Powering HTC’s Amaze to Samsung’s own Galaxy S II LTE, it is a capable, power-efficient chip with a lacklustre GPU. Though Honeycomb is mostly hardware-accelerated, performance is not uniformly good on the Tab 8.9. It is significantly smoother in almost every respect than the first batch of Tegra 2-powered tabs, but still does not meet the 1:1 touch-to-movement ratio we expect in a touchscreen device. There were too many times I waited for the device to merely respond to me, often for up to half a minute, before the app would inevitably crash.

Browsing is also an inconsistent affair: at times pages load instantly, while in other cases they stall or stutter. Pinch-to-zoom, a simple yet important example of the 1:1 movement expectation, stutters more than it doesn’t. When the browser works, it’s great: Samsung has revamped the stock Honeycomb browser, maximizing the usable space, so desktop sites render full and lovely. The Tab 8.9 LTE is also a fanstastic media consumption device. It is light enough to travel with, and though I may be down about its inconsistent performance, it has plenty of processing power. I loaded a 720p video encoded with h.264 and it looked beautiful and played fluidly. Games also played well enough, though I noticed the frame rate drop significantly in certain portions of games like Wind-up Knight. The Adreno 220 GPU has a tough time rendering all 1280×800 pixels, and this issue should hopefully disappear as processors get more powerful.

Samsung had a bit of a quandary when choosing a CPU/GPU combination for the Tab 8.9 LTE. Though performance would be much better with its own Exynos 4210 chipset, the Qualcomm part is currently the only LTE-capable dual-core solution on the market. Until 4G basebands are integrated into the chips themselves — and that should be any month now with the introduction of Qualcomm’s MSM8960 — Samsung had very few options. Nonetheless, it is a significant improvement over first-gen Honeycomb tablets, but not nearly fast enough.

In terms of benchmarks, I didn’t run the full suite on the Tab 8.9 because there are no other devices that currently run this chipset at such a high resolution, but the couple the couple I did proved the mettle of Qualcomm’s aging chipset. On paper it’s quite powerful, as you can see from the results below, but in practice the software feels sluggish.

Sunspider Javascript benchmark: 2221.0.ms (Tegra 2 ~ 3200ms)
Linpack: 80.59 MFLOPS (Tegra 2 ~ 35-40MFLOPS)
Vellamo: 1157 (Tegra 2 ~ 800-900)

LTE

The main reason we all came to the party wasn’t necessarily for its good looks but for its speed. The Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE is capable of incredibly fast data speeds, upwards of 75Mbps. It is an advantage that towers over its peers, often eclipsing the maximum speeds obtained through WiFi.

I was able to get 24Mbps downloads and 8Mbps uploads when sitting in a downtown Toronto coffee shop. Moving north of the city speeds dropped somewhat, to 12Mbps down and 6Mbps up. When there is no LTE coverage the Tab falls back to 42Mbps HSPA+ so, like the Galaxy S II LTE (which uses the same baseband) you’re not going to be wanting for network speeds.

A tablet can utilize the larger LTE pipe better than a phone can, since it is often rendering full desktop pages and streaming HD movies over the air. The occasional 50+MB download didn’t bother me as it once did over 3G and there isn’t that wait one usually has when buffering YouTube videos. It’s a nice reality to get used to, but it’s expensive. LTE data is still at a premium as carriers are currently running a $50/10GB promotion.

Cameras

The Tab 8.9 has the same 3.2/2MP combination as its big brother, and the results are fair at best. Often grainy, rarely vibrant, the back camera often takes over a second to focus on the fore subject and another half second to shoot. Low-light shots will turn out grainy and grey, while daytime photos tend to be soft. The back camera can also shoot 720p video which suffers from the same soft and muted palette as its stills.

The 2MP front camera works well for video conferences over GChat or Tango, and is the only practical lens on the device: even at a relatively small size it is cumbersome and often mildly embarrassing to hold up a tablet to take a photo.

Battery Life

It’s hard to gauge battery life on a Tab since it isn’t employed as often as a phone in every day use. With a significantly bigger battery, too, the Tab 8.9 LTE should last up to a week on a single charge with moderate use.

Looping a 720p video on auto brightness yielded just less than 6.5 hours of playback, which is not as high as the eight hours we obtained on the Tab 10.1, but with a 6100mAh battery compared to the 7000mAh cell inside its larger peer the results are what we expected. We turned packet data off for that test; keeping the LTE connection on and idle shaved nearly two hours off the result, to 4.5 hours of playback.

Obviously turning LTE on will reduce battery life significantly so it’s nice to know there is a toggle inside the Settings app to change it to HSPA- or even WiFi-only if you’re looking to eek out the most juice possible. Couple that with Samsung’s Power Saving mode and you won’t need to carry around a charger every day (even though it’s mercifully more compact than Asus’ or Acer’s power pack).

I replaced my WiFi-only iPad for a week with the Tab 8.9 LTE and the experience was mixed. Obviously with LTE turned on I wasn’t expecting an apples-to-apples result, but the things I typically do on a tablet are not very battery- or bandwidth-intensive. I scan through Google Reader, do a bit of blogging in the WordPress app, visit MobileSyrup.com a couple hundred times in the browser, read some Game of Thrones in Aldiko Premium, and stream some music through Rdio. Whenever possible I connect to WiFi.

Where I got at least four days with the iPad, I rarely got past three on the Tab 8.9. This in itself is no surprise — smaller battery, 4G connectivity, higher-resolution display — but it’s something to keep in mind.

Closing Thoughts

As far as Android tablets go, the Tab 8.9 is currently at the top of the heap. But comparing an Android tablet to the iPad is a completely different conversation than comparing an Android phone to the iPhone. In many ways, we are in a holding pattern: Android 4.0 has yet to be revealed for tablets, though what we’ve seen of it is far less of an overhaul than we’d hoped. It should bring a strong set of improvements — swipe to exit apps, better performance, more fonts — but it’s unlikely to be the equivalent leap that Android phones experienced going from Gingerbread to Ice Cream Sandwich.

You can make the hardware as stunning as you like, and Samsung has done a great job with that here, but Honeycomb is missing two major things: reliably smooth performance, and third-party apps. Perhaps ICS will bring the first one, though we doubt it, but more importantly it’s up to developers to bring the second. They need to see financial incentive in developing for the platform — or at least updating their existing phone apps to better support larger screens, which is much easier in ICS — and until then Honeycomb, and ICS, will be compared to iOS as the have-not operating system.

Moreover, the Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE is prohibitively expensive. We say this time and time again, but it’s not feasible to price your devices above the market leader. At $429.95 on a 3-year term and $649.95 outright the Tab is just priced too high. We understand that LTE is currently a premium service, but you’re paying for the data in spades. And with the inevitable onslaught of quad-core tablets coming at CES, the chipset inside the Tab 8.9 just isn’t powerful enough for our needs.

But, if I wanted a tablet right now, and money was not a factor, the Tab 8.9 LTE would be the one to go with. Period. There isn’t a better Honeycomb tablet currently available in Canada. Just check the date of this article before you counter me.

Related posts:

Discussion

26 comments for “Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE Review”

  1. $650 is the same price as high end smart phones such as the Galaxy Nexus or iPhone 4S.

    I don’t understand why people expect tablets with a larger display and a larger battery to cost less.

    If you want something cheaper either get a wifi only tablet or get a laptop.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 2

    Posted by bob | December 15, 2011, 11:53 am
    • The same reason you expect a desktop PC to cost less than a similar laptop. Smaller parts generally cost more for the equivalent power/features.

      I’m not sure how whinedroids don’t understand basic economics but 650$ is extremely expensive for a tablet in a market that is dominated by a 499$ iPad 2. This won’t sell well at all.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 7

      Posted by Raph | December 15, 2011, 12:26 pm
    • Because small screens and small batteries cost more than big screens and big batteries (for the same resolution, capacity).

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3

      Posted by Mathieu | December 15, 2011, 12:44 pm
    • @Raph

      The iPad2 is $520 in Canada, not $500. And the HSPA version is… $650! And that doesn’t even includes LTE.

      Now, a 1280×800 8.9″ display cost more than a 4.3″ 960×540 display. And a big battery alway cost more than a small one.

      The SoC is the same as in the Amaze, so again the cost is the same. The snapdragon CPU isn’t more expensive if you put it in a phone.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

      Posted by bob | December 15, 2011, 2:16 pm
    • According to iSuppli, the components of the 32GB iPhone 4S cost $207. And it’s $325 for the 3G 32GB iPad2, which have much cheaper cameras.

      I hope this will end the myth that a small phone should cost less than a large tablet.

      The 10″ 1027×768 display alone cost $127, against $37 for the 3.5″ 960×640 in the iPhone.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

      Posted by bob | December 15, 2011, 2:37 pm
  2. i Have a Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus. well worth the cash, does everything i need it to, plus if i want internet use, i just turn my mobile wifi on my GSII and it get the job done well. The tab is also blazing Fast, great battery life too! that’s what i would do, just have one imported. :P

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

    Posted by JV | December 15, 2011, 11:54 am
  3. “There were too many times I waited for the device to merely respond to me, often for up to half a minute, before the app would inevitably crash.

    Browsing is also an inconsistent affair: at times pages load instantly, while in other cases they stall or stutter. Pinch-to-zoom, a simple yet important example of the 1:1 movement expectation, stutters more than it doesn’t.”

    ALL Honeycomb Tablets. Not just this one. Hopefully ICS fixes this since it seems to make the Nexus sooo smooth in all respects.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    Posted by J L | December 15, 2011, 11:55 am
  4. Ouuuu I want :)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    Posted by keiYUI | December 15, 2011, 12:10 pm
  5. $425 on a 3 year. No Thanks.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

    Posted by SlimJim | December 15, 2011, 12:42 pm
  6. Wait till after Christmas and the price will drop like a stone when the Transformer Prime comes out.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Ivana Drinkalot | December 15, 2011, 1:17 pm
  7. Better than the Asus Transformer Prime? Questionable….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

    Posted by moony | December 15, 2011, 1:22 pm
  8. @Ralph, you can’t compare a wi-fi only device with a data enabled device. Actually according to Apple Canada, the iPad2 wi-fi only device is listed as $519 (however I believe is may currently be on sale at Futureshop/Best Buy). At the moment, the Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 is not available as wi-fi only. So, let’s look at both as data devices. The iPad 2 wi-fi plus 3G device is listed as $649 on Apples site, the same price as the Samsung Galaxy Tab (without a contract). However, the Samsung Galaxy Tab uses LTE and is orders a magnitude faster. The iPad 2 3G is only 7.2Mbps where as the Samsung Galaxy Tab with LTE can achieve upwards 75Mbps. So the question should really be, why would anyone pay the same price for a 3G device when they could get a much faster LTE device. An to top it off, at least with the Galaxy Tab from a carrier like Bell, you can get a discount on a three 3 data contract, where as no such discount is available on the iPad. So, in the end the iPad is actually way more expensive and far slower (data wise that is). I’m actually holding out for the wi-fi only device which is rumored to sell for around $369, well below the equivalent iPad. However, it won’t be long before Apple releases the iPad 3, and a flurry of ICS quad-core tablets from others OEMs(like the Asus Transfomer Prime) which will make this all moot.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2

    Posted by emc | December 15, 2011, 1:48 pm
    • Of course you can compare them. We’re talking about a tablet market not a network technology market. Do you avoid comparing laptops because they have different connectivity options: with/without bluetooth, wireless G or N, 3G/LTE slot? Of course not and this is the same thing. Tablets are tablets and they compete with each other regardless of the feature set. And you know what, MOST consumers don’t give a hoot about LTE in their tablet (spec obsessed whinedroids aside). My only real point was that this tablet is priced horribly to compete against the market leader (let alone the flood of other mediocre tablets). It will be a small niche clientel and nothing more.

      Equally important is that 3G/LTE tablets sell FAR less than their wifi counterparts. Anyone with a quarter brain and a decent phone can use their own hotspot and can avoid the hefty premiums of 3G/LTE in both hardware and service.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 5

      Posted by Raph | December 16, 2011, 4:06 pm
  9. @SlimJim, It’s not the $425 price that bothers me so much as the 3 year contract at $50 bucks a month. I’m with @JV, get a wi-fi only device and use the wi-fi hotspot feature of the cell phone. I paid $499 for the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 a few months ago, and recently got my wife the Sony Tablet S for $449 (plus $100 of free accessories). Going rates for 16GB wi-fi only devices.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    Posted by emc | December 15, 2011, 2:00 pm
  10. @Moony, only problem with the Asus Transformer Prime is that it’s been delayed because of on going wi-fi connectivity issues. Too bad, I too had high hopes but after the wi-fi fiasco I had with a recent Blackberry Playbook, I’m not taking any chances.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

    Posted by emc | December 15, 2011, 2:05 pm
  11. @Daniel, Even though Bell does match the 10GB for $50, LTE data is not a premium with bell. Any HSPA plan is the same as LTE. Rogers is the one who charges a premium for LTE

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

    Posted by crunch204 | December 15, 2011, 2:36 pm
    • Your clueless opinion is laughable. Rogers has the Same LTE plan for the same price, just because Bell marketing doesn’t call it premium doesn’t mean its not. Otherwise it would be lined up with the Smartphone data plans at $25. I have a LTE Jetstream and my friend has the 8.9 he’s bringing it back because HTC makes a better product.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 4

      Posted by Tydus | January 12, 2012, 11:32 am
  12. This guy and the 10.1 with contract need to seriously drop. You are signing a three year that will cost you well in excess of 1200/1800. They subside more of the phones with that sort of income. Once they drop down to 200/300 you might have more people going for them, but right now I can only sell them to people wanting the mobile data separate from the phone. Yes, I realise they only subsidise 200 because of the data cancellation fees.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Matt | December 15, 2011, 9:40 pm
    • @Matt

      $200 to $300 doesn’t get you very much these days, let alone a high end LTE tablet in 2012. They don’t need to or necessarily want to cater to the budget crowd, Acer found this out the hard way. They just need to sell enough of these to early adopters to make up for their R&D, then post a profit months later. There are people that don’t buy products because they’re cheap. Apple is a perfect example.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

      Posted by aka | December 17, 2011, 4:53 pm
  13. @Ralph

    Typical Crapple Fanboy reply, missed the point completely. Galaxy Tab 8.9 with LTE = $649; iPad 2 with 3G = $649 … same price…PERIOD. However if one is a sucker for 3 year contracts then at least one can get the Galaxy Tab for $425 where as one cannot get any iPad for that price….PERIOD. So in the end, the Galaxy Tab 8.9 is less the any iPad 2 …PERIOD.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 3

    Posted by emc | December 19, 2011, 12:43 pm
  14. Anyone if this tablet has wifi hotspot enabled (tethering)? It would be nice to tether notebooks to an LTE connection.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Ants | January 6, 2012, 9:02 am
    • I have this tablet and I love it. To answer your question, YES, it does have wifi hotspot enabled tethering get over LTE and it works great :-)

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

      Posted by Spike | January 7, 2012, 9:32 am
    • Also forgot to mention you can do USB tethering as well using Windows 7 or Linux.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

      Posted by Spike | January 7, 2012, 9:39 am
  15. I have had no luck with this JB. It keeps saying Error establishing a database connection. I have followed the instruction of going to setting and turning on vpn but there is an error message there to. I have even tried resetting my iPad and nothing.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Glen | January 20, 2012, 3:47 pm
  16. samsug galaxy tab. is b’est.pl.rate

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2

    Posted by ganesh ram | February 16, 2012, 6:59 am
  17. i got this tablet for 25 dollars at rogers store. 3 year contract and i can upgrade in two years. the data plan is 19 dollars per month. i took it camping this long weekend, and it was awesome. it’s like having a laptop at your fingertips at all times. pretty cool man!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by fuser | May 22, 2012, 3:32 pm

Post a comment