
Samsung is now known these days for their Galaxy S series of Android devices. But those premium devices are not in everyone’s price range, and over the last year the company has released many low-to mid-level phones to fill in the gaps in consumer demand.
Now, going forward, each product will be remanded under a specific category, each standing for its particular market. In the premium range we will have the Galaxy R series (which future Galaxy S devices will be referred to); in the high-end range will be the Galaxy W; the mid-level will be Galaxy M; entry-level Galaxy Y. Pretty smart stuff, right?
In addition, “Plus” monikers will refer to improved premium devices such as those with shiny bezels or faster radios; “Pro” will continue to classify devices with hardware keyboards; and finally “LTE” will refer to, you guessed it, ones with LTE radios on board.
Whether this will decrease confusion in the market or just add a new layer awaits to be seen, but it’s nice to know that a company with as many products as Samsung wants to make it less stressful for us to decide which one of their products to buy. Now that’s considerate.
Source: Phandroid
Did Nokia just move away from this consept, because it was too confusing?
Like or Dislike:
16
2
They should have combined the high-end and premium into one category, less clutter and easier to understand.
Like or Dislike:
13
2
What’s next, the return of Roman numerals?
Like or Dislike:
12
2
Latin.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
I like it. It isn’t perfect and I think they have 1 category more than they need, but it’s nice to see a solid effort in a consistent naming scheme.
Like or Dislike:
12
2
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Like or Dislike:
5
28
I want a category B for “big battery”!
Like or Dislike:
12
4
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Like or Dislike:
3
17
Why are you talking about Blackberry’s?
Like or Dislike:
4
3
Then again, why are we talking about Nokia!? Even they have a lot of different classes: low-end, mid-range and high-end.
When people thumb down but don’t leave a comment, except for yourself, it just shows that they don’t even care about their own opinion. Nine people didn’t bother at all to counter my claims.
Anyway, it’s true that BlackBerry has an “all-or-nothing” type of approach to smartphone classes. Either you pay very little for a Curve or Pearl, or you pay very much for a Bold or Torch. This is simply true, and there’s no in-betweeners, so why am i getting thumbed down!? Is there some secret BlackBerry phone out there?
Bottom line, when it comes to a BlackBerry, it’s a tough choice, because there is such a huge gap between the Curve and Bold.
Like or Dislike:
2
5
I wasn’t talking about Nokia, Wrong Colin dude……lol
Like or Dislike:
0
0
So is the Galaxy R that was just released for Europe supposed to be a premium phone? Tegra2 is more of an M or Y tier in my opinion. This is confusing, and if they stay this vague, us fanatics will still have to rely on benchmarks and reviews for the final say. Which would make this naming scheme irrelevant.
Like or Dislike:
1
3
Tegra 2 is atleast a “W” not “M” or “Y”..
Like or Dislike:
0
0
what’s the difference b/n premium and high tier?
Like or Dislike:
0
2
and i still don’t know what the s stands for!
galaxy s
incredible s
desire s
iphone 3gs
iphone 4s (?)
Like or Dislike:
6
1
Speeeeed!
Other cheesy one-letter acronyms include i for internet and e for electronic. Thank apple for making the alphabet hipster.
Like or Dislike:
4
0
how about ‘sexy’ or ‘sex’? =]
or… ‘supreme’ and ‘superb’?
Like or Dislike:
5
0
The new Samsung Galaxy Sex!
I’d buy one
Like or Dislike:
4
0
A -High end/premium
B -Budget and medium end
C -All the really cheap ones
I’s as easy as ABC
Like or Dislike:
13
2
Young Minded definitely makes me feel special XD
Like or Dislike:
6
1
Odd. It just makes me feel old.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Will my next phone be a Galaxy R Plus Pro LTE? Only time will tell…
Like or Dislike:
9
0
faster radio? do you mean faster processor, and maybe an improved radio??
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Magical eh? Seems like that should be the top tier.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
Except that there’s a good chance nearly everyone will just think the M stands for “medium” or “middle”.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
Random letter designations with additional markers to distinguish additional sub categories. How exactly is that either ‘pretty smart’ or simplified.
Keep It Simple Stupid. Seems like Samsung never learned this basic, fundamental business concept.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
could be worse. Coudl do what Nokia does and release phones like the:
Nokia C1-01
Nokia C2-01
Nokia C3
Nokia C3-01
Nokia C5-03
Nokia C6-01
Nokia C7
Nokia E5
Nokia E6
Nokia E7
Nokia E71
Nokia N8
Nokia X3
Nokia X3-02 Touch & Type
Nokia X6
Nokia X7
Nokia 5130 XpressMusic
Nokia 5230
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
Nokia 6303i Classic
Nokia 6700 Classic
Nokia 6700 Slide
That’s easier I think….. *puke
Like or Dislike:
4
0
Special… like Special K?
Like or Dislike:
0
2
So I could get an “Samsung Galaxy R666 Plus Pro LTE” – sweeeet!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
This just goes to show how thoroughly Samsung has saturated the market, and why it was probably a bad idea to start calling *everything* a “Galaxy”. There is no way that this will simplify the consumer’s perception of Samsung’s portfolio, it will only ruin any chance they had of making “Galaxy S” (if not “Galaxy, before they went crazy with it) a recognizable name that consumers are loyal to (like the iPhone).
Like or Dislike:
0
0
So R is the new S. I wonder if the Galaxy R series is going to be minimum 4.3″ screens? The existing premium S2 variants and Hercules feature 4.3″ and 4.5″ screens respectively. I wish Samsung would seriously consider a 4″ Galaxy R in the future. I assume the Hercules is the same size as the Infuse which looks more like a mini Galaxy Tab than a phone. Also my S2 does not travel well in my jeans and fall right around the corner. It sucks that premium superphone = big screen.
Like or Dislike:
0
0