Follow Us:
16

Acer Liquid E selling for $374.99 at Future Shop

By on June 22, 2010 at 8:26am in Asides, Mobile News, Rogers Wireless News, Various News

Thanks to one of our tipsters for sending us their receipt of their brand spanking new Acer Liquid E. The good thing about this receipt is that if you’re looking to pick up this Android-powered device you can go to your local Future Shop and get it for the no-contract price of $374.99. This is $50 cheaper than what Rogers is selling it for.

Related posts:

  1. Future Shop selling HTC Dream & Magic for $49.99!
  2. Future Shop selling Bold for $279.99
  3. Acer Liquid E to launch in June for $49.99 on 3-year
  4. More upcoming Rogers Acer Liquid e pricing…

Discussion

16 comments for “Acer Liquid E selling for $374.99 at Future Shop”

  1. I would’ve included a picture of the Acer Liquid E in this post too.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Ahmed Eltawil | June 22, 2010, 8:36 am
    Reply to this comment

  2. I’m sure there’s a huge markup on these devices. Wouldn’t be surprised if Future Shop and other stores started selling these and many will probably start going the unlocked route.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Don | June 22, 2010, 8:56 am
    Reply to this comment

  3. And a good review link. But I guess it wasn’t worth it. ;)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by DavidM | June 22, 2010, 9:01 am
    Reply to this comment

  4. Don, I would love to see that happen. High end handsets prop up the perception that consumers need to get their device ‘subsidized.’ With decent handsets appearing in shops we can expect more competition, choice, better pricing, and eventually the carriers will be forced to stop charging ‘subsidy’ fees, which would result in 20% lower bills for many.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by DavidM | June 22, 2010, 9:14 am
    Reply to this comment

  5. I’d love to see Mobile Syrup do a review of this phone.

    It’s 1 of 2 cell phones running Android 2.1 in all of Canada and they haven’t done their own review of it yet.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Jason Powell | June 22, 2010, 10:39 am
    Reply to this comment

  6. Would you guys do a review on the Acer Liquid E please and thanks? I’ve been waiting for a review for weeks now. Also can you put an end to false information on the phone. Most sites are saying its exactly like the first Liquid but fail to mention its got a brighter screen and the RAM has been increased from 256mb to 512mb. Thanks

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by gunstar | June 22, 2010, 12:04 pm
    Reply to this comment

  7. I agree a review on the ACER Liquid E should be done by Mobile Syrup. It’s the only Android phone on the Rogers system running Android 2.1.

    I think it’s becasue it’s not a BB, HTC, iPhone, we won’t get a review.

    I’ve sent several youtube mail messages to Mobile Syrup requesting a review as well.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Jason Powell | June 22, 2010, 12:31 pm
    Reply to this comment

  8. Review the Acer Liquid E already!!! I am trying to decide between this and the Xperia X10

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Dreamcast | June 22, 2010, 3:15 pm
    Reply to this comment

  9. Why the hell couldn’t this phone carry the AWS 1700 mhz band and work with wind!!!

    This would be perfect!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Eric | June 22, 2010, 3:27 pm
    Reply to this comment

  10. Dreamcast, I too am undecided between the Xperia X10, Acer Liquid E, 3gs or 4g iPhone. I’m not really an Apple fan, and would prefer an Android phone.

    With a Snapdragon processor, Android 2.1, the processor being under used allows for it to speed up in case of updates to Android 2.2/3.

    I am so surious what it works like on a Canadian carrier, etc….

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Jason Powell | June 22, 2010, 4:00 pm
    Reply to this comment

  11. Yeah Jason I’ve been trying to figure it out for weeks now and I still don’t know. If the Xperia X10 would get multi-touch with 2.1 it would be an instant purchase for me but Sony has been flip flopping with “its not possible” to “its getting Multi touch” to again “its not getting it”…ugh. I wish Canada would get the Evo 4g I want a BEAST of a phone :( I am thinking I will end up getting the Liquid E because it will do everything I want right out of the box.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Dreamcast | June 22, 2010, 5:11 pm
    Reply to this comment

  12. Is this phone unlockable yet ???

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by jeremie bouchard | June 22, 2010, 8:15 pm
    Reply to this comment

  13. Maybe “IF” Mobile Syrup does a review they will let us know if it’s unlockable.

    You should all email them through this webpage and youtube like I did. If a review is requested more, maybe they will consider it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Jason Powell | June 22, 2010, 8:34 pm
    Reply to this comment

  14. The HTC legend uses 2.1 Android also, and it’s processer is 600mhz. Apparently the Legend is very quick so I hope that translates into the Acer Liquid E being super fast since it runs at 786mhz.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Jason Powell | June 22, 2010, 8:42 pm
    Reply to this comment

  15. The Liquid E is locked to Rogers. I verified that with an AT&T SIM – no go. I have emailed a number of unlocking vendors, and they replied back that they are not able to unlock Liquid E yet.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Michael Long | June 23, 2010, 4:59 pm
    Reply to this comment

  16. It actually costs $425 at future shop, i checked 2 days ago. They people I asked claimed to have no knowledge of it ever selling for $375, and told me the computer just told them it was $425.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Posted by Eric | June 29, 2010, 5:11 pm
    Reply to this comment

Post a comment