Comments on: Rogers cuts 900 jobs due to “intensifying competition”

By: Colin

Colin — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:55:20 +0000

My sympathies to those who have lost their jobs. I am partially responsible as I cancelled my monthly agreement with Rogers recently. I had been holding out for some lower prices but instead prices were raised – sorry but I couldn’t afford it any more. I’m sure I wasn’t the only one.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Sam A.

Sam A. — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:23:41 +0000

David you are correct. I think it’s sad that 900 people lost their jobs at Rogers especially around the holidays…

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: David Trepanier

David Trepanier — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:51:11 +0000

Guys, 900 people are out of a job today. I thinks those are the real victims. Maybe we need to make Rogers feel our anger for what their doing.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Arshad

Arshad — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:14:12 +0000

I just hope this means lower rate plans, but knowing Rogers, I doubt that too.

And to Sam A.’s comment, well said. I wouldn’t be surprised they add that fee on to their GRRF or replace it with something higher calling it that and pass on the restructuring cost to customers.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Larry

Larry — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:23:06 +0000

Rogers is no longer a leader in wireless.Telus/Bell are know the leaders.Rogers had a whole year to prepair for this,What did they do? Answer NOTHING at all.They deserve this.You can’t just sit there and do nothing in this market.Good ridience it was not nice knowing you.Just loving “Canadas most unreliable network”

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Jean-Francois Barsoum

Jean-Francois Barsoum — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:55:29 +0000

Scanning the headline quickly, I misread and thought that Rogers was getting the N900. Darn.

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Sam A.

Sam A. — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:32:36 +0000

I have a scoop for all of you!! Rogers new fee will replace the GRRF with the new “intensifying competition” fee

Like or Dislike: 0 0