<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More iPhone Nano rumours&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobilesyrup.com/2009/01/13/more-iphone-nano-rumours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobilesyrup.com/2009/01/13/more-iphone-nano-rumours/</link>
	<description>Mobile News &#38; Reviews for Canadians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted Avery</title>
		<link>http://mobilesyrup.com/2009/01/13/more-iphone-nano-rumours/comment-page-1/#comment-22517</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilesyrup.com/?p=6554#comment-22517</guid>
		<description>I think now that Canada was finally on board with the 3G launch, we&#039;ll get all subsequent models. Rumour was the main issue on the first launch was the data-intensity of the device, when Canada was still reaping the benefits of overpriced data plans, but who knows. Now that the pricing model for the iPhone is in place, it&#039;s just a matter of shipping out new hardware for next models.

I still can&#039;t see why they would make an iPhone Nano though... For it to be significantly smaller, the applications would have to accommodate a whole new screen size. And who would want a smaller screen, especially with the existing iPhone already so affordable? But who knows, it&#039;s always hard to predict what Apple will release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think now that Canada was finally on board with the 3G launch, we&#8217;ll get all subsequent models. Rumour was the main issue on the first launch was the data-intensity of the device, when Canada was still reaping the benefits of overpriced data plans, but who knows. Now that the pricing model for the iPhone is in place, it&#8217;s just a matter of shipping out new hardware for next models.</p>
<p>I still can&#8217;t see why they would make an iPhone Nano though&#8230; For it to be significantly smaller, the applications would have to accommodate a whole new screen size. And who would want a smaller screen, especially with the existing iPhone already so affordable? But who knows, it&#8217;s always hard to predict what Apple will release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
