<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More iPhone Nano rumours&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobilesyrup.com/2009/01/13/more-iphone-nano-rumours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobilesyrup.com/2009/01/13/more-iphone-nano-rumours/</link>
	<description>Canadian Mobile Phone News &#38; Reviews - Cell phones and Accessories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:17:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Avery</title>
		<link>http://mobilesyrup.com/2009/01/13/more-iphone-nano-rumours/#comment-22517</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilesyrup.com/?p=6554#comment-22517</guid>
		<description>I think now that Canada was finally on board with the 3G launch, we&#039;ll get all subsequent models. Rumour was the main issue on the first launch was the data-intensity of the device, when Canada was still reaping the benefits of overpriced data plans, but who knows. Now that the pricing model for the iPhone is in place, it&#039;s just a matter of shipping out new hardware for next models. 
 
I still can&#039;t see why they would make an iPhone Nano though... For it to be significantly smaller, the applications would have to accommodate a whole new screen size. And who would want a smaller screen, especially with the existing iPhone already so affordable? But who knows, it&#039;s always hard to predict what Apple will release. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think now that Canada was finally on board with the 3G launch, we&#039;ll get all subsequent models. Rumour was the main issue on the first launch was the data-intensity of the device, when Canada was still reaping the benefits of overpriced data plans, but who knows. Now that the pricing model for the iPhone is in place, it&#039;s just a matter of shipping out new hardware for next models.</p>
<p>I still can&#039;t see why they would make an iPhone Nano though&#8230; For it to be significantly smaller, the applications would have to accommodate a whole new screen size. And who would want a smaller screen, especially with the existing iPhone already so affordable? But who knows, it&#039;s always hard to predict what Apple will release. </p>
<p>Like or Dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-22517" src="http://mobilesyrup.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_16_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('22517', 'add', 'mobilesyrup.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_16_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-22517-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933; display: inline;;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-22517" src="http://mobilesyrup.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_16_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('22517', 'subtract', 'mobilesyrup.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_16_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-22517-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033; display: inline;;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

