<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Telus responds to incoming text message charge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobilesyrup.com/2008/07/11/telus-responds-to-015-text-message-increase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobilesyrup.com/2008/07/11/telus-responds-to-015-text-message-increase/</link>
	<description>Mobile News &#38; Reviews for Canadians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:17:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: midtoad</title>
		<link>http://mobilesyrup.com/2008/07/11/telus-responds-to-015-text-message-increase/comment-page-1/#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator>midtoad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilesyrup.com/?p=1818#comment-1766</guid>
		<description>Telus says &quot;overall text messaging rate changes affect a small segment of TELUS’ wireless customer base and are limited to those who do not currently subscribe to a text messaging plan.&quot;   Errm, that small segment would be 80% of its users.  According to a recent survey of US cell users, 80% had NEVER sent a text message. Telus has managed to piss off 80% of its users with this ill-considered cash grab.  What they are trying to create is a climate of fear, trying to scare customers into buying a text plan (and thus increasing the earnings per customer). 

Telus, Bell and Rogers are all engaged in a concerted and coordinated campaign to raise their rates and lock in as many customers as possible with 3-year plans so that when competition comes, they are facing it from as strong a position as possible. This is monopolistic behaviour at its worst.  

If the big three were truly interested in competition, they&#039;d be preemptively lowering their rates now so that the new entrant could not make any money. Instead, they&#039;re shooting themselves in their feet and making it easier for the new entrant to look good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telus says &#8220;overall text messaging rate changes affect a small segment of TELUS’ wireless customer base and are limited to those who do not currently subscribe to a text messaging plan.&#8221;   Errm, that small segment would be 80% of its users.  According to a recent survey of US cell users, 80% had NEVER sent a text message. Telus has managed to piss off 80% of its users with this ill-considered cash grab.  What they are trying to create is a climate of fear, trying to scare customers into buying a text plan (and thus increasing the earnings per customer). </p>
<p>Telus, Bell and Rogers are all engaged in a concerted and coordinated campaign to raise their rates and lock in as many customers as possible with 3-year plans so that when competition comes, they are facing it from as strong a position as possible. This is monopolistic behaviour at its worst.  </p>
<p>If the big three were truly interested in competition, they&#8217;d be preemptively lowering their rates now so that the new entrant could not make any money. Instead, they&#8217;re shooting themselves in their feet and making it easier for the new entrant to look good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
